ON THE EVE OF VOTE OF SCOTTISH VOTE FOR DEVOLUTION

QUANDARY ON THE EVE OF VOTE FOR A DEVOLVED SCOTLAND

"HOW DID WE POPULATE OUR ISLANDS?"

Academic reaction to our findings from the moss of Cruden and elsewhere in NE Scotland appears to suggest that there has been a great lack of, serious; consideration given to the probability that the inhabitants of what is now known as Scotland 500,000 years ago were any different to those who existed in what is now known as England 500,000 years ago!

However it does appear that our past and current information, gathered from study of the shores of the two rifts of the Great Glen and the Highland Boundary fault; is being, unacceptably; neglected by some "Media" Archaeologists and Archaeological Professionals' press who I have contacted.

This might change soon.

PALAEOLITHIC SCOTLAND and ITS CONTRIBUTION TO PROBABLE "SAFE FRACKING"

Dear All

As, I believe to be, a respected engineer in the oil/gas Industry and an amateur archaeologist  I have studied over the past three years, or so; the pros and cons for fracking and have identified Scotland, due to its geological and geomorphological situation on our planet to provide one of the most benign regions on our planet for the exploitation of Fracking.

The main reason is the closeness of the of the target areas to the surface:-

This gives tremendous relief to any new technologies which

1. No need for excessive overland transport of water.
2. Capability of in-line PD Omnidyne being placed at appropriate distance from targeted fissure level.
3. Minimal use of chemicals.
4. Etc;

I will be publishing above pointers on my "Palaeolithic Scotland" articles on the internet as it was through these investigations, by myself and others, which allowed us to come to the above conclusions.

I have been privileged to serve!

Jack Sneddon.

COMMUNICATIONS TO THE PRIME MINISTER, FIRST MINISTER OF SCOTLAND and LEADER OF HM OPPOSITION.

The Prime Minister 
Hon. David Cameron MP 
10 Downing Street 
West Minster 
London
SW1A 2AA

Dear Prime Minister,
I shall be brief but cover probably c. 2M years and more of our great nation’s contribution to the spread of our species over our planet. 
This has sadly been ignored or neglected by a very large majority of our country’s most senior Archaeological cadre.
For more than 20 years others and I have been in contact with some of the highest archaeological academics in our country discussing the amazing finds we made on the “Moss of Cruden” and by others in Buchan and elsewhere in NE Scotland.
All of the Documentation of our finds from the “Moss of Cruden” can be found on the “net” under:-
• Palaeolithic Scotland.
• Two Shores of Eden.
It appears that a dearth of investigation, over the past 200 odd years; has been accorded to important geomorphological, soil science, unnaturally modified flint artefacts and extremely important amphibian fossils; all of which reside between “The Great Glen” and “Highland Boundary” faults.
In the interest of our planet’s future I truly believe that these alleged oversights should be scrutinised.
Please respond,

Yours Sincerely,

John L Sneddon.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE!

WHAT IF!

I hope to be publishing soon on responses from letters which I will be sending to:- Our Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister, Leader of the Opposition and Scotland's First Minister.

The gist of the letter will embody all published articles on "Palaeolithic Scotland" and their apparent neglect by some "Professional" archaeologists who have been aware of our findings from the moss of cruden for 20 odd years.

Happisburgh and Boxgrove findings would appear to post date our findings on the Moss of Cruden by about 1,000,000 years.

If we confirm this amazingly probable situation within the next few weeks, how would evidence of Scotland being inhabited, by what can be established as having been human beings; perhaps 1/2 a Million years or more prior to the colonisation of the southern extremities of our, now established Great Britain; have a sway in the argument FOR an independent Scotland?

THE GRAND NEGLECT!

THE GRAND NEGLECT

The conclusions derived by some of our professionals, regarding how our species evolved and populated our planet have been "Weighed and Found Wanting".

Nowhere in, published; Archaeological annals can I find any serious national effort having been made to tie up the archaeological findings on the moss of Cruden with the geomorphology of the area!

This is, to my mind; a travesty of the first order.

If there is anyone out there who can put their hand on their heart and say that they never considered such a link please get back to me quickly and I will start my application for some recognition as being the first.

Watch this space.

IMPORTANT FOLLOW UP TO PREVIOUS POST

Please find below copy of a, non confidential information Bulletin sent to socantscot.

Dear all, 

There really is something out there!. 

Watch this space and read the two publications mentioned below, for your own good. 
It is indeed unfortunate that my previous 11,000 hits were erased by "The Society" as they may have opened up a window in your minds. 

EMERGING EVIDENCE FOR A PALAEOLITHIC SCOTLAND. 

I have been studying two Recent papers:- 
1. Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. 
2. Palaeolithic and Mesolithic Scotland : Scarf Panel Report. 

In the Scarf report I can find no reference to the important British Geological Society information given in report 1, regarding the ancient geological formation of the Scottish landscape which might suggest that our finds from the moss of Cruden are both unique and are a stepping stone in the stream which seems to be dividing two shores ie:- 
Intellectual Archaeology and Practical Geology.

IMPORTANT EMERGING NEWS ON PALAEOLITHIC SCOTLAND

The following is copy communication to Online Archaeology:-


EMERGING EVIDENCE FOR A PALAEOLITHIC SCOTLAND.

I have been studying two Recent papers:-
1. Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland.
2. Palaeolithic and Mesolithic Scotland : Scarf Panel 
Report.

In the Scarf report I can find no reference to the important British Geological Society information given in report 1, regarding the ancient geological formation of the Scottish landscape which might suggest that our finds from the moss of Cruden are both unique and are a stepping stone in the stream which seems to be dividing two shores ie:-
Intellectual Archaeology and Practical Geology.

Both Scarf and Online Archaeology will be in receipt of this communication.

                                                     FAST FORWARD TO THE PAST!


                                                      FAST FORWARD TO THE PAST!

It has taken a long time but!

STATEMENT!

The analyses of our findings from the moss of Cruden and the "spin-offs" which have followed e.g. "Palaeolithic Scotland","Two Shores of an Eden". have never, ever been challenged!

This is quite sad,so:- 
I call on all of you, professors, doctors, Press correspondents, rank and file and amateur archaeologists who I have previously contacted to rebut my following, categoric; statement that :-

" The small land mass which currently exists between the great glen and the highland boundary fault lines has never been seriously considered as a source of information regarding the metamorphosis of our planet, both geologically and anthropologically.

"WHY NOT?"

Oh it may be on their future TV series or academic agenda but they will not be able to claim the the identification of the importance of the "Moss of Cruden" 

That lies with Dr. EA Fitzpatrick et al.

(Published from Online Archaeology Article)