Dear All,
Please refer to the "net"regarding "Gillies Hill"
This is an "Emergency"
Allegedly, if quarrying proceeds;an inestimable amount of important information regarding the evolution of our species might wind up as "Gravel"!
I feel it important that I advise you of this.
Dear "no-reply@change.org"
Please respond to my previous e-mail communication to you, by
return!
vis:-
The significance of the "Defacing" of Gillies hill as regards its
place in our "Island's" (UK) heritage and the probable destruction
of priceless Geomorphological information, Flora and Fauna and, not
least of all; the Hidden Place of Bruce's reserves "The Sma'
Folk"??? should not be treated lightly.
"The Sma' Folk"? well they were indeed pledged to a life of piety
and endurance but there is no doubt that the pride of English
chivalry would have fled from such a "Rag Tag and Bobtail" as has
been described, so far.
Oh! there was, perhaps a "force" hidden at Gillies Hill, probably
700 or so, "All on Foot" however, their flag appears to have been
the "Beauseant" (Black on White") and not "Rag a Muffin"'
sheet!
Please contact me for any other information you might need for
clarification.
Jack Sneddon.
Wednesday, 11 February 2015
Sunday, 11 January 2015
BREAKING NEWS HAPPY NEW YEAR!!
Dear all "Palaeolithic Scotland" reviewers on Blogspot,
May you have a happy New Year!
Please find below an important message to "Online Archaeology"
Recent analyses which I have conducted on our findings on "The Moss of Cruden" and the synergy which I found with them when I relate to when I excavated at Boxgrove is really quite profound.
I will publish this as soon as I can.
Happy New Year for 2015 to all at Online Archaeology!
Sorry for not getting back sooner but I have been back checking all of my experiences at Boxgrove with our findings from the moss of Cruden. There is an interesting anomaly which exists at both sites!
As we move, roughly; inland from "Beach" Boxgrove there is a great "dump" of flint material which I never got an explanation for when I was assisting, as an amateur; and asked the questions why? and how?!
Well, as coincidence might have it; the first time I experienced a phenomenon like this was on the "Moss of Cruden" about 4 or 5 years earlier where a great dump of flint nodules, both virgin and worked; protected our site at "Weewindae" as I called it then
(and still do) which lies in a very special basin in the Buchan countryside. The "Heap" at Boxgrove was insignificant when compared to the "Heap" at "Weewindae". There is a substatiatable conundrum forming in my mind as to the relationship of these two "Dumps" and the Palaeolithic finds which they protected and I believe that two of the most important substances which will lay this conundrum to rest are Chalk and Sand which proliferate the Boxgrove sites yet are absent on "The Moss of Cruden"
May you have a happy New Year!
Please find below an important message to "Online Archaeology"
Recent analyses which I have conducted on our findings on "The Moss of Cruden" and the synergy which I found with them when I relate to when I excavated at Boxgrove is really quite profound.
I will publish this as soon as I can.
Happy New Year for 2015 to all at Online Archaeology!
Sorry for not getting back sooner but I have been back checking all of my experiences at Boxgrove with our findings from the moss of Cruden. There is an interesting anomaly which exists at both sites!
As we move, roughly; inland from "Beach" Boxgrove there is a great "dump" of flint material which I never got an explanation for when I was assisting, as an amateur; and asked the questions why? and how?!
Well, as coincidence might have it; the first time I experienced a phenomenon like this was on the "Moss of Cruden" about 4 or 5 years earlier where a great dump of flint nodules, both virgin and worked; protected our site at "Weewindae" as I called it then
(and still do) which lies in a very special basin in the Buchan countryside. The "Heap" at Boxgrove was insignificant when compared to the "Heap" at "Weewindae". There is a substatiatable conundrum forming in my mind as to the relationship of these two "Dumps" and the Palaeolithic finds which they protected and I believe that two of the most important substances which will lay this conundrum to rest are Chalk and Sand which proliferate the Boxgrove sites yet are absent on "The Moss of Cruden"
Wednesday, 17 September 2014
ON THE EVE OF VOTE OF SCOTTISH VOTE FOR DEVOLUTION
QUANDARY ON THE EVE OF VOTE FOR A DEVOLVED SCOTLAND
"HOW DID WE POPULATE OUR ISLANDS?"
Academic reaction to our findings from the moss of Cruden and elsewhere in NE Scotland appears to suggest that there has been a great lack of, serious; consideration given to the probability that the inhabitants of what is now known as Scotland 500,000 years ago were any different to those who existed in what is now known as England 500,000 years ago!
However it does appear that our past and current information, gathered from study of the shores of the two rifts of the Great Glen and the Highland Boundary fault; is being, unacceptably; neglected by some "Media" Archaeologists and Archaeological Professionals' press who I have contacted.
This might change soon.
"HOW DID WE POPULATE OUR ISLANDS?"
Academic reaction to our findings from the moss of Cruden and elsewhere in NE Scotland appears to suggest that there has been a great lack of, serious; consideration given to the probability that the inhabitants of what is now known as Scotland 500,000 years ago were any different to those who existed in what is now known as England 500,000 years ago!
However it does appear that our past and current information, gathered from study of the shores of the two rifts of the Great Glen and the Highland Boundary fault; is being, unacceptably; neglected by some "Media" Archaeologists and Archaeological Professionals' press who I have contacted.
This might change soon.
Friday, 20 June 2014
PALAEOLITHIC SCOTLAND and ITS CONTRIBUTION TO PROBABLE "SAFE FRACKING"
Dear All
As, I believe to be, a respected engineer in the oil/gas Industry and an amateur archaeologist I have studied over the past three years, or so; the pros and cons for fracking and have identified Scotland, due to its geological and geomorphological situation on our planet to provide one of the most benign regions on our planet for the exploitation of Fracking.
The main reason is the closeness of the of the target areas to the surface:-
This gives tremendous relief to any new technologies which
1. No need for excessive overland transport of water.
2. Capability of in-line PD Omnidyne being placed at appropriate distance from targeted fissure level.
3. Minimal use of chemicals.
4. Etc;
I will be publishing above pointers on my "Palaeolithic Scotland" articles on the internet as it was through these investigations, by myself and others, which allowed us to come to the above conclusions.
I have been privileged to serve!
Jack Sneddon.
As, I believe to be, a respected engineer in the oil/gas Industry and an amateur archaeologist I have studied over the past three years, or so; the pros and cons for fracking and have identified Scotland, due to its geological and geomorphological situation on our planet to provide one of the most benign regions on our planet for the exploitation of Fracking.
The main reason is the closeness of the of the target areas to the surface:-
This gives tremendous relief to any new technologies which
1. No need for excessive overland transport of water.
2. Capability of in-line PD Omnidyne being placed at appropriate distance from targeted fissure level.
3. Minimal use of chemicals.
4. Etc;
I will be publishing above pointers on my "Palaeolithic Scotland" articles on the internet as it was through these investigations, by myself and others, which allowed us to come to the above conclusions.
I have been privileged to serve!
Jack Sneddon.
Saturday, 31 May 2014
COMMUNICATIONS TO THE PRIME MINISTER, FIRST MINISTER OF SCOTLAND and LEADER OF HM OPPOSITION.
The Prime Minister
Hon. David Cameron MP
10 Downing Street
West Minster
London
SW1A 2AA
Dear Prime Minister,
I shall be brief but cover probably c. 2M years and more of our great nation’s contribution to the spread of our species over our planet.
This has sadly been ignored or neglected by a very large majority of our country’s most senior Archaeological cadre.
For more than 20 years others and I have been in contact with some of the highest archaeological academics in our country discussing the amazing finds we made on the “Moss of Cruden” and by others in Buchan and elsewhere in NE Scotland.
All of the Documentation of our finds from the “Moss of Cruden” can be found on the “net” under:-
• Palaeolithic Scotland.
• Two Shores of Eden.
It appears that a dearth of investigation, over the past 200 odd years; has been accorded to important geomorphological, soil science, unnaturally modified flint artefacts and extremely important amphibian fossils; all of which reside between “The Great Glen” and “Highland Boundary” faults.
In the interest of our planet’s future I truly believe that these alleged oversights should be scrutinised.
Please respond,
Yours Sincerely,
John L Sneddon.
Hon. David Cameron MP
10 Downing Street
West Minster
London
SW1A 2AA
Dear Prime Minister,
I shall be brief but cover probably c. 2M years and more of our great nation’s contribution to the spread of our species over our planet.
This has sadly been ignored or neglected by a very large majority of our country’s most senior Archaeological cadre.
For more than 20 years others and I have been in contact with some of the highest archaeological academics in our country discussing the amazing finds we made on the “Moss of Cruden” and by others in Buchan and elsewhere in NE Scotland.
All of the Documentation of our finds from the “Moss of Cruden” can be found on the “net” under:-
• Palaeolithic Scotland.
• Two Shores of Eden.
It appears that a dearth of investigation, over the past 200 odd years; has been accorded to important geomorphological, soil science, unnaturally modified flint artefacts and extremely important amphibian fossils; all of which reside between “The Great Glen” and “Highland Boundary” faults.
In the interest of our planet’s future I truly believe that these alleged oversights should be scrutinised.
Please respond,
Yours Sincerely,
John L Sneddon.
Sunday, 4 May 2014
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE!
WHAT IF!
I hope to be publishing soon on responses from letters which I will be sending to:- Our Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister, Leader of the Opposition and Scotland's First Minister.
The gist of the letter will embody all published articles on "Palaeolithic Scotland" and their apparent neglect by some "Professional" archaeologists who have been aware of our findings from the moss of cruden for 20 odd years.
Happisburgh and Boxgrove findings would appear to post date our findings on the Moss of Cruden by about 1,000,000 years.
If we confirm this amazingly probable situation within the next few weeks, how would evidence of Scotland being inhabited, by what can be established as having been human beings; perhaps 1/2 a Million years or more prior to the colonisation of the southern extremities of our, now established Great Britain; have a sway in the argument FOR an independent Scotland?
Thursday, 17 April 2014
THE GRAND NEGLECT!
THE GRAND NEGLECT
The conclusions derived by some of our professionals, regarding how our species evolved and populated our planet have been "Weighed and Found Wanting".
Nowhere in, published; Archaeological annals can I find any serious national effort having been made to tie up the archaeological findings on the moss of Cruden with the geomorphology of the area!
This is, to my mind; a travesty of the first order.
If there is anyone out there who can put their hand on their heart and say that they never considered such a link please get back to me quickly and I will start my application for some recognition as being the first.
Watch this space.
The conclusions derived by some of our professionals, regarding how our species evolved and populated our planet have been "Weighed and Found Wanting".
Nowhere in, published; Archaeological annals can I find any serious national effort having been made to tie up the archaeological findings on the moss of Cruden with the geomorphology of the area!
This is, to my mind; a travesty of the first order.
If there is anyone out there who can put their hand on their heart and say that they never considered such a link please get back to me quickly and I will start my application for some recognition as being the first.
Watch this space.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)