CONTACT WITH "THE INDEPENDENT" Newspaper (again)

       The following non confidential e-mail was sent to The Independent " news paper


                  URGENT



Good Evening Mr. Keys,

  If you did not received my previous e-mail communications to you nor visited articles on the net vis Palaeolithic Scotland, Palaeolithic Scotland Today,socantscot.org/forum.asp, two shores of eden, etc please do me the courtesy of letting me know.

Otherwise please refer to them  and study them closely.

As a member of The Smithsonian I am now going, Academically; Global.

I will publish this e-mail on my other www outlets as it is by no means confidential and copy to the other press outlets which I am in contact with.

Kind Regards,

Jack Sneddon.

GREAT BRITAIN and IRELAND'S PALAEOLITHIC HERITAGE      
                      ANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED FINDINGS 
                                 from 
               (Moss of Cruden, Happisburgh and Boxgrove) 

Reference to, easily accessible; public information shows that the above pecking order (Moss of Cruden through to Boxgrove) provides a solid stepping stone system toward the understanding of the information which the uniqueness of the British and Ireland Islands can provide regarding   how we colonised our? planet. 

Vis:- 

A) Moss of Cruden :- C. 2,000,000 yrs (ago) 

B) HAPPISBURGH:- C. 800.000 yrs (ago) 

C) BOXGROVE:- C. 500,000 yrs (ago) 

Reviews of Boxgrove material and Happisburgh information ,when compared to our findings from the Moss of Cruden; seem to pale  into some sort of ancient insignificance.

UPDATE for OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES

NEW EVIDENCE 
Tonight I searched through all that I could find on the net and elsewhere regarding the distribution of any serious effort over the past 200 years or so regarding the published; investigative evaluation of Scotland's prehistory and its contribution to the advancement of its Archaeological birthright. 

I fear that certain past conclusions are well in error and, given our findings from the moss of Cruden are in need of "SOME REAPPRAISAL" 

Our conclusions,based upon our findings from our investigations on the moss of cruden; when now taken in conjunction with important geological /geomorphological papers/documents which have become available within the past 2 or 3 years;are about to be vindicated I feel' 

I am receiving some very respected opinions. 

How long that will take, due to the completely unnecessarily imposed inertia of "Past Hypotheses";I know not. 

NEW EVIDENCE

Tonight I searched through all that I could find on the net and elsewhere regarding the distribution of  any serious effort over the past 200 years or so regarding the published; investigative evaluation of Scotland's prehistory and its contribution to the advancement of  its Archaeological birthright.

I fear that certain past conclusions are well in error and, given our findings from the moss of Cruden are in need of  "SOME REAPPRAISAL"

THE MOSS OF CRUDEN and ITS PLACE IN THE CENOZOIC / CAINOZOIC ERA

It seems that as recently as 10 years ago a major re-identification of the "Eras" was called for and has since been  adopted.

Enter:-  "THE CENOZOIC / CAINOZOIC".

Please ref. below:-
Merritt, J.W., Auton, C.A., Connell, E.R., Hall, A.M. and Peacock, J.D. 2003. Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, Sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).

Things are becoming a bit clearer don't you think?

I will follow up soon with further information.

TOPOGRAPHY OF SCOTLAND'S MAIN FAULT LINES

TOPOGRAPHY OF SCOTLAND'S MAIN FAULT LINES

The above presentation is a copy from one published in snh.gov.uk/docs/A33764848.pdf. 

It shows not only the "Two shores of Eden", as prefaced in my previous Blogs; but also The Solway Line (suture of the Lapetus Ocean) . This was the Ocean which was squeezed out of existence with the collision between  what  is now known as Scotland and what is now known as England and is seminal to the proposition that Scotland has a unique, yet neglected; contribution to make as regards the story which she holds. 

However, as it ever does; the worm is definitely turning!

Right now I cannot see where past conclusions, made due to findings from, the mud flats of "Swanscome", the beaches of "Boxgrove" and from the sands of "Happisburgh"; properly fit in with the real palaeolithic story of the British Isles!