Apologies for previous,hackneyed post. I tried to send it via my huddle but was not successful. My follow up post will deal with analyses of the lack of contradiction or defence from most of the respected hierarchical Archaeologists in our country regarding their and others inability to provide a solid case against as to why "The Moss of Cruden" is producing evidence of PALAEOLITHIC habitation!
Well please look out for my next post which I shall send from my computer.
Apologies for previous,hackneyed post. I tried to send it via my huddle but was not successful. My follow up post will deal with analyses of the lack of contradiction or defence from most of the respected hierarchical Archaeologists in our country regarding their and others inability to provide a solid case against as to why "The Moss of Cruden" is producing evidence of PALAEOLITHIC habitation!
Well please look out for my next post which I shall send from my computer.
Dear All,
ReplyDeleteApologies for previous,hackneyed post. I tried to send it via my huddle but was not successful. My follow up post will deal with analyses of the lack of contradiction or defence from most of the respected hierarchical Archaeologists in our country regarding their and others inability to provide a solid case against as to why "The Moss of Cruden" is producing evidence of PALAEOLITHIC habitation!
Well please look out for my next post which I shall send from my computer.
Dear All,
ReplyDeleteApologies for previous,hackneyed post. I tried to send it via my huddle but was not successful. My follow up post will deal with analyses of the lack of contradiction or defence from most of the respected hierarchical Archaeologists in our country regarding their and others inability to provide a solid case against as to why "The Moss of Cruden" is producing evidence of PALAEOLITHIC habitation!
Well please look out for my next post which I shall send from my computer.